Take a few minutes to
reflect on your experience preparing
for your presentation.
• Provide rationales for your choice of
activities. Why did you choose your activities? Did you consider other
possibilities before deciding?
We chose the activities based
on our individual interests and what we thought would most enhance the project.
We asked the questions about cultural differences and how they effected the
classroom because it was most relevant to them and the topic. The matching
activity was based on the Deaf and Hearing differences. We chose that stereotype
specifically because our interest includes the Deaf culture. We chose a
matching activity because we wanted the students to see all the different
stereotypes that are associated with the Deaf community.
• Describe how you chose what role each presenter
would play in the development and delivery of your presentation. What personal
strengths did you consider in the process?
Lisa took the main “teaching” roles
because that is her desire: to be a teacher. I took the role of explaining
cultural differences within the deaf community and gave the instructions for
the activity to most match my role and a representative of the deaf students or
clients I will have in the future.
Take a few minutes to
reflect on your presentation experience.
• Describe how your presentation most
accurately reflected the instructional strategy you used. What criteria of your
teaching style did you address? How
might you have improved your presentation?
We tried to keep it collaborative
and interactive, unfortunately it seemed to come out as a lot of expository.
Although that wasn’t the intention, because we waited so long to do the
matching activity and didn’t have a lot of group discussion, the presentation
became exposirty-like. We could have made the questions we proposed in the
beginning a group discussion and focused on that more. Also, we could have done
the matching game before we discussed the cultural differences and stereotypes;
so the class could have seem where they thought wrong about Deaf people.
• Reflect on your learners’ responses to
your presentation. What aspects do you feel worked well, what would you change,
and why?
It seemed a lot
of people enjoyed the activity with bringing in a “deaf” and a “hearing” person
into the classroom and the differences in how they enter a room or
conversation. Also, the class liked that we focused on the Deaf aspect, liked
that we provided a handout and sent the videos before hand. Lastly, one person
said they actually liked the way we had the activity because they were able to construct
their own understanding of the deaf and hard of hearing culture.
On the other hand, most
people were confused by the matching activity because of our minimal
explanation. Also, a lot mentioned our presentation was heavy on the expository
and while we were having technical difficulties we could have engaged the
class. Finally, some said we could have discussed our source more.
How is your personal theory of
learning demonstrated in your activities and the reactions of your peers? Use
specific examples of your teaching as well as peer comments/responses as
evidence for your analysis.
I think my Personal Theory of
Learning came through by the building on what we already know about stereotypes
and cultural differences and applying it to the deaf and hard of hearing
culture (constructivism). But because I tend to focus more on social cognitive
theory, this was applied through the activity with the matching. Through that
activity we were able to learn about stereotypes that a student may not have
thought of before if they hadn’t discussed the situation with others.
No comments:
Post a Comment